Current:Home > InvestHarvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Harvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling
View Date:2024-12-23 22:05:04
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that affirmative action in higher education is unconstitutional, arguing that the race-conscious admission policies of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina violate the Constitution.
"Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points," Chief Justice John Roberts said in the majority opinion. "We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today."
In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the majority opinion contradicts "the vision of equality embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment."
"The court cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter," Sotomayor said.
In response to the court's decision, Harvard said in a statement that it will comply with the new ruling, but that it will need to navigate how to preserve and uphold its "essential values."
"We write today to reaffirm the fundamental principle that deep and transformative teaching, learning, and research depend upon a community comprising people of many backgrounds, perspectives, and lived experiences," Harvard's leadership said. "That principle is as true and important today as it was yesterday."
The university acknowledged that the diverse backgrounds of its students and faculty are important factors and should not be ignored.
"To prepare leaders for a complex world, Harvard must admit and educate a student body whose members reflect, and have lived, multiple facets of human experience," the statement read. "No part of what makes us who we are could ever be irrelevant."
In his own statement , Kevin M. Guskiewicz, chancellor for the University of North Carolina, said the school was disappointed by the decision, but that it will follow the court's guidance.
Guskiewicz was among several college administrators who indicated that the court's decision could create uncertainty and confusion regarding admissions procedures moving forward.
"I know that this decision may raise questions about our future and how we fulfill our mission and live out our values," Guskiewicz said. "But Carolina is built for this, and we have been preparing for any outcome."
The consideration of race in admissions for public universities is already banned in nine states: California, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma, New Hampshire, Nebraska and Washington — but Thursday's ruling will now also impact private universities in these states.
Michael V. Drake, president of the University of California system, which oversees nine public schools in the state, said in a statement that the ruling ends a "valuable practice that has helped higher education institutions increase diversity and address historical wrongs over the past several decades."
"The consideration of race was not the conclusive solution to inequities in college admissions, but it was a necessary pathway to addressing systemic deficiencies," Drake wrote. "Without it, we must work much harder to identify and address the root causes of societal inequities that hinder diverse students in pursuing and achieving a higher education."
In her response, Carol Folt, University of Southern California president, wrote that "we will not go backward."
"This decision will not impact our commitment to creating a campus that is welcoming, diverse, and inclusive to talented individuals from every background," Folt said.
Columbia University said that it is still working to understand the full implications of the ruling.
"Diversity is a positive force across every dimension of Columbia, and we can and must find a durable and meaningful path to preserve it," university spokesperson Ben Chang said in a statement.
Ron Daniels, president of Johns Hopkins University, called the court's ruling a "significant setback in our efforts to build a university community that represents the rich diversity of America."
"This is particularly distressing given the long history of racial discrimination in our country and the relatively brief period of time during which we have succeeded in recruiting significant numbers of outstanding underrepresented students to Johns Hopkins," Daniels said.
Rice University officials also called the ruling "disappointing."
"From a campus in the heart of the United States' most diverse city, we will continue our efforts to create a class of students that is multifaceted in race, gender, ideology, ability, geography and special talents," Rice President Reginald DesRoches and Provost Amy Dittmar said in a joint statement. "Such diversity is critical in solving the most perplexing, challenging problems already known, and those we have not yet encountered."
The University of Pennsylvania said it will fully comply with the decision, but will continue to admit students with wide-ranging backgrounds and experiences.
"In full compliance with the Supreme Court's decision, we will seek ways to admit individual students who will contribute to the kind of exceptional community that is essential to Penn's educational mission," the statement from UPenn President Liz Magill and Provost John L. Jackson, Jr. read.
- In:
- University of North Carolina
- Supreme Court of the United States
- College
- University of California
- Harvard
Simrin Singh is a social media producer and trending content writer for CBS News.
veryGood! (7657)
Related
- ‘I got my life back.’ Veterans with PTSD making progress thanks to service dog program
- Here's how much money a grocery rewards credit card can save you
- Vinyl records outsell CDs for the first time since 1987
- CNN Producer David Bohrman Dead at 69
- Judith Jamison, acclaimed Alvin Ailey American dancer and director, dead at 81
- In Baltimore, Helping Congregations Prepare for a Stormier Future
- Robert Smith of The Cure convinces Ticketmaster to give partial refunds, lower fees
- Texas says no inmates have died due to stifling heat in its prisons since 2012. Some data may suggest otherwise.
- Mike Tyson is expected to honor late daughter during Jake Paul fight. Here's how.
- Dancing With the Stars Alum Mark Ballas Expecting First Baby With Wife BC Jean
Ranking
- Reese Witherspoon's Daughter Ava Phillippe Introduces Adorable New Family Member
- Why platforms like HBO Max are removing streaming TV shows
- New drugs. Cheaper drugs. Why not both?
- Will the Democrats’ Climate Legislation Hinge on Carbon Capture?
- Watch a rescuer’s cat-like reflexes pluck a kitten from mid-air after a scary fall
- Warming Trends: The Cacophony of the Deep Blue Sea, Microbes in the Atmosphere and a Podcast about ‘Just How High the Stakes Are’
- Florida couple pleads guilty to participating in the US Capitol attack
- Taylor Swift Issues Plea to Fans Before Performing Dear John Ahead of Speak Now Re-Release
Recommendation
-
Wildfire map: Thousands of acres burn near New Jersey-New York border; 1 firefighter dead
-
Permafrost expert and military pilot among 4 killed in a helicopter crash on Alaska’s North Slope
-
Here's how much money a grocery rewards credit card can save you
-
Angela Bassett Is Finally Getting Her Oscar: All the Award-Worthy Details
-
The Masked Singer's Ice King Might Be a Jonas Brother
-
Warming Trends: Telling Climate Stories Through the Courts, Icy Lakes Teeming with Life and Climate Change on the Self-Help Shelf
-
New Florida Legislation Will Help the State Brace for Rising Sea Levels, but Doesn’t Address Its Underlying Cause
-
We found the 'missing workers'